Earlier today in Rhode Island, the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) approved the Deepwater Wind/National Grid Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) for the construction of an eight-turbine wind farm in Block Island Sound, denying CLF’s Motion to Dismiss.

Here’s what CLF’s Rhode Island Advocacy Center Director Tricia Jedele had to say about the decision:

Today’s ruling was inevitable, a result dictated by the legislature in a law defined so narrowly that it could have only one outcome. Unchallenged, this law and the accompanying PUC decision set precedent that will only undermine the efforts to build a future for renewable energy in Rhode Island. The failure to allow the PUC any discretion in its decision-making is the very basis of CLF’s Separation of Powers argument, which we are likely to appeal to the Supreme Court.

The Deepwater Wind project in Block Island Sound first met with problems in April 2010 when its Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) with National Grid was rejected by the PUC on the grounds that it was not commercially reasonable. Rather than appeal the decision, Deepwater, with the support of the Governor and the legislature, sought to do an end run around the review process and rewrite the rules to produce a different outcome the second time around. CLF, a longtime champion of renewable energy done right, was one of the first to challenge the moves as unlawful, unfair and a terrible precedent. CLF contended that the amended law was designed to favor one project and one developer, creating an unlevel playing field that would make it impossible for developers to compete successfully for future projects.

“Renewable energy is too important to this state to do it in a way that could threaten its chances for success,” Jedele said at the time.

In July, in advance of a second review of the PPA required under the amended law, CLF filed a Motion to Dismiss, arguing that the PUC should not review the amended Power Purchase Agreement because the law violates the Constitutional doctrine of separation of powers, and the provision which requires that “all laws be made for the good of the whole.” CLF also argued that even if the PUC were to proceed, it could not review the PPA because the doctrine of res judicata bars litigation of a claim that has already been litigated between the same parties.

Through a recently released tool authored by the World Resources Institute as part of Google’s Public Data Explorer, users are able to visualize greenhouse gas emissions like never before:

On a per capita basis, New England states are leading the pack with some of the lowest numbers.

Why?

1. New England states tend to be more efficient in our use of electricity and natural gas.
2. As our states are more compact and developed, New Englanders generally drive less.
3. New Englanders typically drive more efficient vehicles.

The proof, as they say, is in the pudding:

Of course, there’s still plenty of room for improvement – and in this midst of this climate crisis, we’re all going to have to do much better to turn things around.

On an appropriately wet and windy afternoon yesterday in Boston, the Massachusetts House of Representatives passed the Wind Energy Siting Reform Act with a vote of 101-52. Modeled after the bill passed by the Senate in February, the Act will streamline the siting process for wind energy projects, making it easier for developers and local authorities alike to incorporate well-designed wind power initiatives into the plan to meet the state’s energy demand. The new legislation is a major step towards building a clean energy economy for Massachusetts and reducing dependence on fossil fuels. The bill will now head to a House-Senate conference committee for further discussion.

Here’s what Sue Reid, director of CLF’s Massachusetts Clean Energy and Climate Change Program, had to say on the issue:

“Massachusetts needs to tap into its abundant wind energy resources in order to meet its clean energy goals. We are delighted that the Massachusetts House of Representatives has joined the Senate in passing this wind siting reform bill that is crucial to meeting the state’s energy demand while reducing greenhouse gas emissions and preserving our natural resources. This new legislation will make it easier to develop well-designed wind energy projects. Today’s vote represents a key victory in the state’s ongoing efforts to reduce our dependence on dirty fossil-fuel fired power in Massachusetts.”

Read CLF’s full press statement>>
Learn more about CLF’s renewable energy initiatives in MA and throughout New England>>

Last Friday, CLF filed a motion to intervene as a defendant in support of Amendment 16 in a federal lawsuit challenging the new groundfishery management regulations, which went into effect on May 1, 2010. The lawsuit, brought by the cities of Gloucester and New Bedford and members of the fishing industry, broadly challenges the new fishing regulations – known as Amendment 16 – on a variety of grounds. CLF, which has long fought for a science-based, more balanced system of fisheries management to ensure a sustainable fishing industry, supports Amendment 16 as critical to ending decades of overfishing in federal waters off of New England’s coast. CLF will intervene as a defendant with the Department of Commerce and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the senior officials of which were both named as parties.

“The new rules introduced under Amendment 16 are game-changing,” said Peter Shelley, CLF vice president and director of its Massachusetts Advocacy Center. “They have to be to achieve the balance that is needed between the size of our fishing fleet and the amount of fish New England waters can produce, if we want a sustainable fishing industry for generations to come. Importantly, the rules also introduce unprecedented levels of flexibility into the system in an effort to help the fleet operate more efficiently and safely.”

The 2010 fishing season introduced the most sweeping set of changes to New England groundfish fisheries since the Magnuson-Stevens Act was enacted in 1976, establishing U.S. jurisdiction on fisheries within 200 miles of the coast. Amendment 16 put into place science-based catch limits and accountability measures to minimize overfishing of key groundfish, such as cod and pollock, as well as a new management system called sector allocation, designed to provide fishermen more flexibility in organizing their businesses.

Shelley continued, “Large management changes such as these do not come without myriad frustrations from unintended consequences that need to be addressed. In order to get to the results the broader fishing and conservation communities want from these new rules, everyone – governments, regulators, fishermen and conservation groups – needs to work together to get it right. The early data from these new rules is encouraging. We need to face the inevitable challenges and see this through.”

What would make your neighborhood great? Is it more jobs, better transportation choices, diverse housing opportunities, improved access to open spaces like parks and playgrounds? The Massachusetts Smart Growth Alliance (MSGA) Great Neighborhoods program wants to help turn your community’s dreams into reality. The MSGA is looking to partner with community groups to develop initiatives that will build better neighborhoods in the Greater Boston area.

The MSGA wants to hear from you. To put your ideas into action, submit a letter of interest explaining your proposed project and how it will benefit your community by July 15, 2010. The letter should be no more than 2-3 pages in length.

Click here to read more about the Great Neighborhoods program and view the MSGA’s official guidelines for writing and submitting your letter of interest.

CLF welcomes its brand new group of 2010 summer interns. CLF’s summer internship program gives undergraduate and graduate students a unique real-world experience in the world of environmental law, as well as communications, development and other aspects of daily operations here at CLF. Some may even be posting to this very blog! They are:

Massachusetts
Stephanie Bair, Cavers Legal Intern, Harvard Law School
Tiffany Egbuono, Posse Scholar (Advocacy/Development), Undergrad Bryn Mawr College
Anthony Mathieu, Posse Scholar (Oceans), Undergrad Hamilton College
Megan Hodson, Cavers Legal Intern, U Baltimore School of Law
Zachary Moor, Cavers Legal Intern, Boston University
Caitlin Peale, Cavers Legal Intern, Columbia U Law School
Emily Migliaccio, Ocean Intern, Boston College

Maine
Caitlin Casey, Intern, Undergrad Colby College
Becky Lipson, Cavers Legal Intern, U Michigan Law School
Michael Knapp, Cavers Legal Intern, U Maine Law School
Lauren Parker, Intern, U Maine Law School

New Hampshire
Alan Panebaker, Cavers Legal Intern, Vermont Law School
Robert Barry, Cavers Legal Intern, Northeastern University

Rhode Island
Jenna Algee, Cavers Legal Intern, Roger Williams School of Law

Vermont
Nate Hausman, Cavers Legal Intern, Lewis & Clark Law School
Haley Peterson, Volunteer, Hamilton College
Susan Law, Cavers Legal Intern, Western New England College School of Law

As the oil disaster continues in the gulf, watch the live feed below (windows media player required).

Angry? Frustrated? Had enough? Click here to tell President Obama to take action today – and help us prevent an oil disaster in New England.

Now is our chance.

On Thursday, May 27, the Vermont Public Service Board (PSB) will hold a public hearing on whether to shut down Vermont Yankee right now, instead of waiting until 2012. You will have the opportunity to tell the PSB what you think—whether the PSB should shut down the plant now, or take other action to address the ongoing leaks, false information and company misconduct that violates state laws.

It is important for our regulators, the Vermont Public Service Board, to hear from you.

What can you do to help? Join a growing community of concerned people like you by attending the public hearing on May 27. Tell the PSB what YOU think should happen to Vermont Yankee.

Public Hearing on Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station
Thursday, May 27
7:00 p.m.
Gymnasium at Vernon Elementary School
381 Governor Hunt Road, Vernon, VT

One more voice might be all we need to stop Vermont Yankee in its tracks for good—make it yours.