In new testimony filed last Friday, CLF offered proof from two experts that Entergy’s inadequate monitoring and prevention measures at Vermont Yankee have allowed unlawful contamination of groundwater and the environment. Moreover, the testimony shows that Entergy knew about the potential for leaks years before they occurred and is failing now to take steps to prevent leaks and clean up the site.
The testimony’s bottom line? You guessed it. Shut down the plant.
From CLF attorney Sandra Levine:
“Entergy’s response to the leaks is too little and too late. The continued contamination of groundwater and the Connecticut River must stop. Entergy is shortchanging Vermont and leaving an expensive hazardous waste site to clean up in the future.”
CLF submitted testimony from two experts: David Lochbaum, a nuclear engineer with the Union of Concerned Scientists, and Stratton French, a consulting hydrologist. You can read CLF’s press release and download the testimony on clf.org, but here are a few choice exerpts from the experts’ findings.
Mr. Lochbaum, on the fact that the leaks at Vermont Yankee are hazardous:
“It is analogous to a motorist driving while intoxicated. If no one was killed, the violation is still not condoned. The violation itself presents a serious risk of harm that must be addressed.”
Mr. Lochbaum recommended that the Public Service Board should prohibit Vermont Yankee from continuing to operate until Entergy has demonstrated that it has fixed all existing leaks and undertaken all necessary measures to prevent future ones, including at minimum: providing access to and means to monitor all systems, including underground pipes; regular inspections of all systems to identify and repair potential leak sources before leaks occur; and eliminating all uncontrolled discharges of radionuclides and radioactive materials into groundwater and surface water.
Mr. French on the extent of contamination and appropriate remediation efforts:
“Entergy VY has proposed to remove…less than one dump truck of soil [for remediation]. Soil sampling to characterize the degree and extent of contamination prior to remedial efforts is both needed and typical when addressing soil contaminated with any hazardous material. What is atypical is that the scope of remedial efforts in this trench was established by Entergy VY, despite sampling results indicating the extent of soil contamination is not known or adequately defined. Furthermore, the degree of contamination reported is suspect, casting doubt on the sampling and/or analytical programs utilized. The information known is not adequate to characterize the degree or extent of contamination or the remediation needed.”
More:
Read the full news release on clf.org>>
Download the testimony>>
Popularity: 1% [?]