<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Boston, Sea Level Rise and Building In the Path of Disaster</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.clf.org/blog/clean-energy-climate-change/boston-sea-level-rise-and-building-in-the-path-of-disaster/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.clf.org/blog/clean-energy-climate-change/boston-sea-level-rise-and-building-in-the-path-of-disaster/</link>
	<description>For a thriving New England</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 21:21:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Leeson</title>
		<link>http://www.clf.org/blog/clean-energy-climate-change/boston-sea-level-rise-and-building-in-the-path-of-disaster/#comment-2110</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Leeson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 16:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clf.org/?p=8371#comment-2110</guid>
		<description>So True...and remember that Providence, like Boston, was built on what was originally a harbor, surrounded by marshlands, and is basically at Sea Level.  



A God and important comment on an under publicised threat...Collaboration with RI could also produce good results for the state and for CLF&#039;s Reputation here.

Yes, we do have a hurricane barrier in Providence, but:

 - it has already proven to be unreliable on at least one occasion that has been publicized, and

 - seaward of the barrier are many industrial and residential entities which are at or near current sea level and will be negatively affected by the rise in sea levels. and

-  much of the RI shoreline and the land surroundiing its many harbors are near sea level and directly open to the ocean

-  one of the main issues mentioned in Pilkey&#039;s Op Ed is the fact that the real facts and threats are not receiving the publicity they need; and, partially as a result of this, the pulic and its governing bodies are not knowledgeable and/or prepared.  And, since newspapers are no longer read in depth (despite some scanning on Smart Phones/Computers) by a significant proportion of the population...so his Op Ed probably will have little influence on governmenrt boddies or their constituents...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So True&#8230;and remember that Providence, like Boston, was built on what was originally a harbor, surrounded by marshlands, and is basically at Sea Level.  </p>
<p>A God and important comment on an under publicised threat&#8230;Collaboration with RI could also produce good results for the state and for CLF&#8217;s Reputation here.</p>
<p>Yes, we do have a hurricane barrier in Providence, but:</p>
<p> &#8211; it has already proven to be unreliable on at least one occasion that has been publicized, and</p>
<p> &#8211; seaward of the barrier are many industrial and residential entities which are at or near current sea level and will be negatively affected by the rise in sea levels. and</p>
<p>-  much of the RI shoreline and the land surroundiing its many harbors are near sea level and directly open to the ocean</p>
<p>-  one of the main issues mentioned in Pilkey&#8217;s Op Ed is the fact that the real facts and threats are not receiving the publicity they need; and, partially as a result of this, the pulic and its governing bodies are not knowledgeable and/or prepared.  And, since newspapers are no longer read in depth (despite some scanning on Smart Phones/Computers) by a significant proportion of the population&#8230;so his Op Ed probably will have little influence on governmenrt boddies or their constituents&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>