<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You Say ‘Food Waste,’ I Say ‘Renewable Energy’: New DEP Regs Create Pathway for Anaerobic Digestion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.clf.org/blog/clf-ventures/you-say-food-waste-i-say-renewable-energy-new-dep-regs-create-pathway-for-anaerobic-digestion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.clf.org/blog/clf-ventures/you-say-food-waste-i-say-renewable-energy-new-dep-regs-create-pathway-for-anaerobic-digestion/</link>
	<description>For a thriving New England</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2013 23:46:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Assino</title>
		<link>http://www.clf.org/blog/clf-ventures/you-say-food-waste-i-say-renewable-energy-new-dep-regs-create-pathway-for-anaerobic-digestion/#comment-2726</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Assino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 10:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clf.org/?p=13387#comment-2726</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, &quot;...source separated materials are distinguished from “waste”, so qualifying facilities will not be permitted as solid waste facilities...&quot;. That is great but isn&#039;t it very hard to regulate? Won&#039;t all the shady dealers &quot;cowboys&quot; claim to be source separating, but not, and using this as a loophole to avoid regulatory costs and undercut the &quot;good guys&quot;? Despite that I like it, its an Interesting post, and a great new inititative - if it can be regulated. Thanks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, &#8220;&#8230;source separated materials are distinguished from “waste”, so qualifying facilities will not be permitted as solid waste facilities&#8230;&#8221;. That is great but isn&#8217;t it very hard to regulate? Won&#8217;t all the shady dealers &#8220;cowboys&#8221; claim to be source separating, but not, and using this as a loophole to avoid regulatory costs and undercut the &#8220;good guys&#8221;? Despite that I like it, its an Interesting post, and a great new inititative &#8211; if it can be regulated. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk

 Served from: www.clf.org @ 2013-09-18 17:53:57 by W3 Total Cache --