Earlier this week, the Concord Monitor published a must-read editorial addressing PSNH’s future. Much like an earlier widely-printed op-ed on the subject, the editorial correctly describes the PSNH death spiral of escalating costs, fleeing customers, and dirty inefficient power plants kept alive by massive ratepayer subsidies. The editorial also points out one key reason why PSNH’s argument that its plants are an insurance policy against high natural gas prices is increasingly off the mark: it ignores the damage that those plants do to the climate and to the environment. In 2012, despite not operating for much of the year, PSNH’s plants were nonetheless collectively the single largest source of greenhouse gas emissions in New Hampshire. As time goes on, PSNH’s “insurance policy” argument only gets more specious. Relying on inflexible read more…
- Christophe Courchesne on Northern Pass Update: New Opportunities to Make Your Voice Heard
- Lynne R. Sellers on Vermont Yankee Closing: Advocacy and Activism Kept Pressure on Aging Plant
- Scott Hening on Northern Pass Update: New Opportunities to Make Your Voice Heard
- Mark Orzeck on Show Up and Speak Out at the Final Round of Public Scoping Meetings for Northern Pass
