<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Conservation Law Foundation &#187; natural gas efficiency</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.clf.org/blog/tag/natural-gas-efficiency/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.clf.org</link>
	<description>For a thriving New England</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2013 13:58:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Public Hearing: Gas Pipeline Expansion</title>
		<link>http://www.clf.org/blog/clean-energy-climate-change/public-hearing-gas-pipeline-expansion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.clf.org/blog/clean-energy-climate-change/public-hearing-gas-pipeline-expansion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 16:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sandy Levine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Energy & Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CLF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse gas emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New England]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clf.org/?p=14456</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Vermont Public Service Board will be holding a public hearing on the proposed expansion of Vermont Gas facilities. Vermont Gas Systems Expansion Thursday evening, March 21, 2013 7:00 p.m  Champlain Valley Union High School in Hinesburg, Vermont At a time when climate change is upon us we must think carefully about putting in place new fossil fuel systems that will be around for a very long time. Keeping us hooked on fossil fuels for many years is a bad idea. The Board will be considering the proposed route, which runs through valuable wetlands and farmland. This is the beginning of a bigger project to supply gas across Lake Champlain to New York. It also moves Vermont closer to being able to access gas supplies from fracking, which is ongoing in New<a href="http://www.clf.org/blog/clean-energy-climate-change/public-hearing-gas-pipeline-expansion/"> read more...</a></p><p>The post <a href="http://www.clf.org/blog/clean-energy-climate-change/public-hearing-gas-pipeline-expansion/">Public Hearing: Gas Pipeline Expansion</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.clf.org">Conservation Law Foundation</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Vermont Public Service Board will be holding a public hearing on the proposed expansion of Vermont Gas facilities.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Vermont Gas Systems Expansion</strong></p>
<p><strong>Thursday evening, March 21, 2013</strong></p>
<p><strong>7:00 p.m  </strong></p>
<p><strong>Champlain Valley Union High School in Hinesburg, Vermont</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>At a time when climate change is upon us we must think carefully about putting in place new fossil fuel systems that will be around for a very long time. Keeping us hooked on fossil fuels for many years is a bad idea.</p>
<p>The Board will be considering the proposed route, which runs through valuable wetlands and farmland. This is the beginning of a bigger project to supply gas across Lake Champlain to New York. It also moves Vermont closer to being able to access gas supplies from fracking, which is ongoing in New York and Pennsylvania.</p>
<p>Come let the Board know what concerns you have. Tell the Board you want to make sure energy is used wisely and that Vermont takes steps now to reduce our addiction to fossil fuels. It is important for the Public Service Board to hear from you.</p>
<p>The post <a href="http://www.clf.org/blog/clean-energy-climate-change/public-hearing-gas-pipeline-expansion/">Public Hearing: Gas Pipeline Expansion</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.clf.org">Conservation Law Foundation</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clf.org/blog/clean-energy-climate-change/public-hearing-gas-pipeline-expansion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From Off the Coast of Massachusetts: A Cautionary Tale About Natural Gas Infrastructure</title>
		<link>http://www.clf.org/blog/clean-energy-climate-change/a-cautionary-tale-about-natural-gas-infrastructure-from-off-the-coast-of-massachusetts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.clf.org/blog/clean-energy-climate-change/a-cautionary-tale-about-natural-gas-infrastructure-from-off-the-coast-of-massachusetts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 15:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seth Kaplan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Energy & Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gas pipelines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liquefied natural gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural gas efficiency]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clf.org/?p=13588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The front page of the Boston Globe last week presented a powerful, timely and cautionary tale about  two liquefied natural gas terminals  that sit off the coast of Gloucester and Salem. Those terminals are the tangible reminder of a massive push undertaken by energy industry insiders to build such terminals.  The intensity of that push, which began to build around 2002, becoming most intense during the 2004  to 2007 period and then petering out in the years since, contrasts sharply with the reality described in the Globe article: that those two offshore terminals have sat idle for the last two years. That push to build LNG import facilities, which was such a mania in energy industry circles circa 2005, yielded some crazy ideas, like the proposal to hollow out a<a href="http://www.clf.org/blog/clean-energy-climate-change/a-cautionary-tale-about-natural-gas-infrastructure-from-off-the-coast-of-massachusetts/"> read more...</a></p><p>The post <a href="http://www.clf.org/blog/clean-energy-climate-change/a-cautionary-tale-about-natural-gas-infrastructure-from-off-the-coast-of-massachusetts/">From Off the Coast of Massachusetts: A Cautionary Tale About Natural Gas Infrastructure</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.clf.org">Conservation Law Foundation</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The front page of the Boston Globe last week presented a powerful, timely and cautionary<a href="http://www.bostonglobe.com/business/2013/01/23/offshore-gas-terminals-mass-bust-far/Qu8dyZzF6yBNAsDNaTT1ZJ/story.html" target="_blank"> tale</a> about  two liquefied natural gas terminals  that sit off the coast of Gloucester and Salem. Those terminals are the tangible reminder of a massive push undertaken by energy industry insiders to build such terminals.  The intensity of that push, which began to build around 2002, becoming most intense during the 2004  to 2007 period and then petering out in the years since, contrasts sharply with the reality described in the Globe article: that those two offshore terminals have sat idle for the last two years.</p>
<p>That push to build LNG import facilities, which was such a mania in energy industry circles <a href="http://articles.marketwatch.com/2005-06-30/news/30771724_1_weaver-s-cove-energy-natural-gas-import-terminal">circa 2005</a>, yielded some crazy ideas, like <a href="http://business.highbeam.com/3972/article-1G1-138069563/rep-backs-lng-plan">the proposal to hollow out a Boston Harbor Island</a> and the infamous <a href="http://www.clf.org/blog/clean-energy-climate-change/finally-weavers-cove-lng-throws-in-the-towel/">Weavers Cove project</a> in Fall River. The offshore terminals, while the least bad of those proposals, reflected short sighted thinking detached from careful regional planning.  Both in terms of the need for these facilities and design decisions like regulators not forcing the projects to share one pipeline to shore instead of (as they did) twice disturbing the marine environment to build two duplicative pieces of infrastructure.</p>
<p>Today, the hue and cry is no longer about LNG, instead we are bombarded with <a href="http://greenmatters.csgeast.org/2012/06/22/new-englands-natural-gas-supply-uncertain-absent-new-pipeline-infrastructure-say-experts/" target="_blank">impassioned demands for more natural gas pipelines</a> as well as more <a href="http://www.commonwealthmagazine.org/Voices/Perspective/Online-Perspectives-2013/Winter/002-Arcate-New-England-needs-to-expand-gas-pipelines.aspx" target="_blank">measured discussions of the need for &#8220;smart expansions&#8221;</a>. Will we have the collective intelligence to be smarter and more careful this time? Will the permitting process force consideration, as the law requires, of alternatives that make better use of existing infrastructure and pose less risk to the environment and the wallets of customers? Fixing<a href="http://www.clf.org/newsroom/new-report-shows-lost-natural-gas-emissions-costing-millions-to-massachusettss-gas-customers-and-harming-environment/" target="_blank"> natural gas leaks </a>and becoming much more efficient in our use of gas is a key &#8220;supply strategy&#8221; that needs to be on the table and fully examined before committing to new pipelines.</p>
<p>And as it so often is, the overarching issue here is protecting future generations by addressing the climate issue. <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2012/06/12/498193/iea-report-natural-gas-is-not-the-answer-to-climate-problem-existing-cleantech-is-and-could-save-100-trillion-by-2050/" target="_blank">Science and prudent energy analysis</a>, makes it clear that we need to put ourselves on a trajectory to end the burning of fossil fuels, including natural gas by the middle of this century. Given this reality every proposal to build massive and long-lived facilities to import more of those fuels must be viewed with great skepticism.</p>
<p>The post <a href="http://www.clf.org/blog/clean-energy-climate-change/a-cautionary-tale-about-natural-gas-infrastructure-from-off-the-coast-of-massachusetts/">From Off the Coast of Massachusetts: A Cautionary Tale About Natural Gas Infrastructure</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.clf.org">Conservation Law Foundation</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clf.org/blog/clean-energy-climate-change/a-cautionary-tale-about-natural-gas-infrastructure-from-off-the-coast-of-massachusetts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk

 Served from: www.clf.org @ 2013-09-18 10:00:09 by W3 Total Cache --