<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Conservation Law Foundation &#187; oil covered animals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.clf.org/blog/tag/oil-covered-animals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.clf.org</link>
	<description>For a thriving New England</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2013 01:23:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The War on Words&#8211;BP Outbids Nonprofits in Oil Disaster Search Terms</title>
		<link>http://www.clf.org/blog/clean-energy-climate-change/the-war-on-words-bp-outbids-nonprofits-in-oil-disaster-search-terms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.clf.org/blog/clean-energy-climate-change/the-war-on-words-bp-outbids-nonprofits-in-oil-disaster-search-terms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 16:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Conservation Law Foundation</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Energy & Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ocean Conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AdWords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ducks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil covered animals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil spill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clf.org/?p=1169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As crews battle the oil disaster in the Gulf of Mexico, a battle of a different sort is unfolding online. It&#8217;s a war of messaging, and BP is sparing no expense. CLF is the recipient of a monthly &#8220;Google Grant,&#8221; a free marketing program that allows non-profit organizations to reach new prospects by &#8220;bidding&#8221; on keywords that are relevant to their work and placing sponsored links in a user&#8217;s search result. So, a user searching on &#8220;renewable energy,&#8221; for example, might find a link to a CLF ad in his search results, if we were successful in bidding for those keywords. As the oil disaster in the Gulf started to unfold, we decided to use our Google Grant to promote our extensive blog coverage on the spill, a passionate outpouring<a href="http://www.clf.org/blog/clean-energy-climate-change/the-war-on-words-bp-outbids-nonprofits-in-oil-disaster-search-terms/"> read more...</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<div></div>
</div>
<div>As crews battle the oil disaster in the Gulf of Mexico, a battle of  a different sort is unfolding online. It&#8217;s a war of messaging, and BP  is sparing no expense.</div>
<div>
<p>CLF is the recipient of a monthly &#8220;Google  Grant,&#8221; a free marketing program that allows non-profit organizations to  reach new prospects by &#8220;bidding&#8221; on keywords that are relevant to their  work and placing sponsored links in a user&#8217;s search result. So, a user  searching on &#8220;renewable energy,&#8221; for example, might find a link to a CLF  ad in his search results, if we were successful in bidding for those  keywords.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.clf.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/oil-animal.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-1171 aligncenter" title="BP Oil Spill" src="http://www.clf.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/oil-animal.jpg" alt="" width="480" height="320" /></a></p>
</div>
<div></div>
<div>As the oil disaster in the Gulf started  to unfold, we decided to use our Google Grant to promote our extensive  blog coverage on the spill, a passionate outpouring of information and  insight from our advocates. It turns out, we weren&#8217;t alone.</div>
<div>
<p>Though  a number of other nonprofit Google Grant recipients had the same idea,  we were all outbid on virtually every oil spill-related keyword. By whom  were we outbid? By BP.</p>
<p>Go ahead and perform a Google search for  &#8220;Gulf Oil Spill&#8221; and pay attention to the top sponsored link. It&#8217;s BP.  And <a id="psf2" title="the link takes users to a carefully crafted page" href="http://www.bp.com/bodycopyarticle.do?categoryId=1&amp;contentId=7052055&amp;nicam=USCSBaselineCrisisJune&amp;nisrc=Google&amp;nigrp=Non_Branded_General&amp;niadv=General&amp;nipkw=gulf_oil_spill">the  link takes users to a carefully crafted page</a> about BP&#8217;s so-called  progress. No pictures of dead marine life. No unemployed fishermen. No  pelicans covered in oil.</p>
<p>How did BP bump out the rest of us? It&#8217;s  a simple matter of economics. Google Grant recipients are only able to  bid up to $1.00 for various keywords. <span>For-profit companies</span>,  on the other hand, can bid as high as their pockets allow. BP&#8217;s  generous bids ensure that their sponsored links appear first in search  results. And long after nonprofit Google Grant allowances are spent,  BP&#8217;s seemingly endless advertising budget continues to fuel their  campaigns around the clock.</p>
</div>
<div>I must admit that  their tactic in out-bidding everyone for keywords is ingenius &#8211; and  perhaps a bit sinister. <span>Google&#8217;s mantra to &#8220;do no evil&#8221; may have inadvertently gone  awry here. The worthy non-profits the Google Grants program is intended  to bolster are losing the keyword battle to big oil. But if the massive  public outcry about the Gulf disaster is any indication, we may not have  lost the messaging war.<br />
</span></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clf.org/blog/clean-energy-climate-change/the-war-on-words-bp-outbids-nonprofits-in-oil-disaster-search-terms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>