<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Conservation Law Foundation &#187; radioactive fish</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.clf.org/blog/tag/radioactive-fish/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.clf.org</link>
	<description>For a thriving New England</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2013 19:02:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Another Radioactive Fish</title>
		<link>http://www.clf.org/blog/clean-energy-climate-change/another-radioactive-fish/</link>
		<comments>http://www.clf.org/blog/clean-energy-climate-change/another-radioactive-fish/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 15:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sandy Levine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Energy & Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radioactive fish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont Yankee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clf.org/?p=5303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Another radioactive fish was found near the Vermont Yankee nuclear plant in southern Vermont.</p><p>The post <a href="http://www.clf.org/blog/clean-energy-climate-change/another-radioactive-fish/">Another Radioactive Fish</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.clf.org">Conservation Law Foundation</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another radioactive fish was found near the Vermont Yankee nuclear plant in southern Vermont.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.clf.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/fishbones.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-5315" title="fishbones" src="http://www.clf.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/fishbones-300x118.jpg" alt="" width="377" height="147" /></a></p>
<p>This is the at least the third time a fish contaminated with Strontium-90 was found in the Connecticut River.</p>
<p>Vermont Yankee officials defy common sense.  They continue to claim   there is no connection between the contaminated fish and the nuclear   reactor on the banks of the river, choosing to blame nuclear bomb testing that took place decades  ago and the 1986 Chernobyl accident.</p>
<p>An <a href="http://www.wcax.com/story/15213626/apnewsbreak-vt-yankee-had-past-radioactive-releases">news articles</a> point out, Vermont Yankee reported Strontium-90 releases to the NRC in annual reports from 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005. So, what is more likely? That these releases caused radioactive isotopes to show up in fish a few miles downstream, or that events taking place over 25 years ago are to blame? During Public Service Board hearings last year, CLF’s expert showed that radioactive isotopes likely migrated through the site along with the  release of tritium.  Hydrogeologist Stratton French testified:</p>
<blockquote><p>“A more likely explanation for their occurence at these  distant locations is that these radioisotopes migrated beyond the  release point along groundwater flow pathways.  This conclusion is  supported by Entergy VY’s own sampling data.”</p></blockquote>
<p>This continues to show that Entergy is an untrustworthy partner to supply Vermont with energy.</p>
<p>The post <a href="http://www.clf.org/blog/clean-energy-climate-change/another-radioactive-fish/">Another Radioactive Fish</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.clf.org">Conservation Law Foundation</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clf.org/blog/clean-energy-climate-change/another-radioactive-fish/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Radioactive Fish near Vermont Yankee</title>
		<link>http://www.clf.org/blog/clean-energy-climate-change/another-radioactive-fish-near-vermont-yankee/</link>
		<comments>http://www.clf.org/blog/clean-energy-climate-change/another-radioactive-fish-near-vermont-yankee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 14:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sandy Levine</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Announcements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Energy & Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Hampshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radioactive fish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont Yankee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vermont yankee leak]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clf.org/?p=1325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Another radioactive fish was found near the Vermont Yankee nuclear plant in southern Vermont. This is the second time a fish contaminated with Strontium-90 was found in the Connecticut River. Vermont Yankee officials defy common sense.  They continue to claim there is no connection between the contaminated fish and the nuclear reactor on the banks of the river. CLF refutes these silly claims.  In testimony CLF filed with the Vermont Public Service Board last Friday, CLF refutes claims that contamination is not moving with water through the ground. CLF&#8217;s expert showed that radioactive isotopes are not limited to areas near the leak.  Instead, they migrated through the site with the release of tritium.  Hydrogeologist Stratton French testified: &#8220;A more likely explanation for their occurence at these distant locations is that<a href="http://www.clf.org/blog/clean-energy-climate-change/another-radioactive-fish-near-vermont-yankee/"> read more...</a></p><p>The post <a href="http://www.clf.org/blog/clean-energy-climate-change/another-radioactive-fish-near-vermont-yankee/">Another Radioactive Fish near Vermont Yankee</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.clf.org">Conservation Law Foundation</a>.</p>]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another radioactive fish was found near the Vermont Yankee nuclear plant in southern Vermont.</p>
<p>This is the second time a <a href="http://www.timesargus.com/article/20100706/NEWS01/7060332/1002/NEWS01">fish contaminated with Strontium-90 was found in the Connecticut River</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.clf.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/fishbones.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1341" title="fish skeleton" src="http://www.clf.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/fishbones.jpg" alt="" width="569" height="224" /></a></p>
<p>Vermont Yankee officials defy common sense.  They continue to claim there is no connection between the contaminated fish and the nuclear reactor on the banks of the river.</p>
<p>CLF refutes these silly claims.  In testimony CLF filed with the Vermont Public Service Board last Friday, CLF refutes claims that contamination is not moving with water through the ground.</p>
<p>CLF&#8217;s expert showed that radioactive isotopes are not limited to areas near the leak.  Instead, they migrated through the site with the release of tritium.  Hydrogeologist Stratton French testified:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;A more likely explanation for their occurence at these distant locations is that these radioisotopes migrated beyond the release point along groundwater flow pathways.  This conclusion is supported by Entergy VY&#8217;s own sampling data.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p style="text-align: center;">COME TO THE PUBLIC SERVICE BOARD <a href="http://www.clf.org/announcements/vermont-yankee-public-hearing-rescheduled-again-for-july-8/"><strong>PUBLIC HEARING ON THURSDAY EVENING</strong> </a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">AT <strong>7:00 p.m. at the  BRATTLEBORO UNION HIGH SCHOOL</strong>.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Tell the Public Service Board whether you think.  Should the plant should be closed before 2012 in response to the continued leaks?  This is your chance for your voice to be heard.</p>
<p>The post <a href="http://www.clf.org/blog/clean-energy-climate-change/another-radioactive-fish-near-vermont-yankee/">Another Radioactive Fish near Vermont Yankee</a> appeared first on <a href="http://www.clf.org">Conservation Law Foundation</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clf.org/blog/clean-energy-climate-change/another-radioactive-fish-near-vermont-yankee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk

 Served from: www.clf.org @ 2013-09-18 18:43:38 by W3 Total Cache --