<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Conservation Law Foundation &#187; St. Croix River</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.clf.org/blog/tag/st-croix-river/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.clf.org</link>
	<description>For a thriving New England</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2013 01:23:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Déjà vu all over again on the St. Croix River</title>
		<link>http://www.clf.org/blog/ocean-conservation/deja-vu-all-over-again-on-the-st-croix-river/</link>
		<comments>http://www.clf.org/blog/ocean-conservation/deja-vu-all-over-again-on-the-st-croix-river/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2012 19:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sean Mahoney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clean Water & Healthy Forests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ocean Conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alewives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Attorney General William Schneider]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clean Water Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grand Falls Dam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lobster Fishery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Passamaquoddy Tribe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St. Croix River]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clf.org/?p=11129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As mentioned in prior posts here and here, CLF’s lawsuit to reopen the St. Croix River to alewives resulted in this letter from EPA agreeing that the Maine Alewife Law violated water quality standards for the St. Croix. Yesterday, the Maine Attorney General responded to that letter here and the response is disappointing to say the least.  The first half of the letter is not even related to the Alewife Law but rather a gratuitous attempt to bolster the State’s efforts to restrict the jurisdiction of the Passamaquoddy Tribe and other Maine tribes.  The second half of the letter does not contest the findings in EPA’s letter that the Alewife Law constitutes a change in the St Croix’s water quality standard but rather attempts to justify that change as a<a href="http://www.clf.org/blog/ocean-conservation/deja-vu-all-over-again-on-the-st-croix-river/"> read more...</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_11130" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://www.clf.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Alewives-St.-Croix-Bog-8-8-12.jpg"><img class=" wp-image-11130" title="Alewives on the St. Croix" src="http://www.clf.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Alewives-St.-Croix-Bog-8-8-12.jpg" alt="" width="480" height="335" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Photo by Robert F. Bukaty, courtesy of Portland Press Herald Archives</p></div>
<p><span style="text-align: left;">As mentioned in prior posts </span><a style="text-align: left;" href="http://www.clf.org/blog/maine/why-clf-filed-a-lawsuit-against-epa-to-restore-alewives-to-the-st-croix-river/" target="_blank"><strong>here</strong> </a><span style="text-align: left;">and </span><strong style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://www.clf.org/blog/maine/alewives-in-maine-make-headway-on-the-st-croix/" target="_blank">here</a></strong><span style="text-align: left;">, CLF’s lawsuit to reopen the St. Croix River to alewives resulted in this </span><a style="text-align: left;" href="http://www.clf.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/EPA-letter-to-Maine-re-Herring-7-9-2012.pdf " target="_blank"><strong>letter</strong> </a><span style="text-align: left;">from EPA agreeing that the Maine Alewife Law violated water quality standards for the St. Croix.</span></p>
<p>Yesterday, the Maine Attorney General responded to that letter <a href="http://www.clf.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/AGs-Alewife-Letter-8-8-12.pdf " target="_blank"><strong>here</strong> </a>and the response is disappointing to say the least.  The first half of the letter is not even related to the Alewife Law but rather a gratuitous attempt to bolster the State’s efforts to restrict the jurisdiction of the Passamaquoddy Tribe and other Maine tribes.  The second half of the letter does not contest the findings in EPA’s letter that the Alewife Law constitutes a change in the St Croix’s water quality standard but rather attempts to justify that change as a fishery management exercise unrelated to the Clean Water Act.</p>
<p>As I noted in a interview yesterday on <a href="http://www.mpbn.net/DesktopModules/PDGNews/MediaPlayer.aspx?PDGNewsStoryID=8981&amp;PDGNewsMediaID=313&amp;TabID=181&amp;ModuleID=3475" target="_blank">MPBN</a>, you can put lipstick on a pig but it is still a pig.  Nor is the State’s “commitment” to the so-called <a href="http://ijc.org/rel/st-croix-alewife/ " target="_blank"><strong>adaptive management plan</strong> </a>for the St Croix currently under consideration by the International Joint Commission of any real value.  As noted in this <a href="http://www.pressherald.com/news/Maine-AG-State-supports-compromise-alewife-plan-.html" target="_blank"><strong>article</strong> </a>by Colin Woodard, the adaptive management plan may be better than nothing but just barely.</p>
<p>What this means for the St Croix is really nothing more than status quo – passage at the Grand Falls dam will remain closed to alewives as long as the State is willing to let bad science and a small minority of self-interested fishing guides call the shots.  This is even more unpalatable given the current crisis that our lobster fishery is in. A resurgent alewife population (close to 3 million before the State closed fish passage) could only help that industry that can use alewives as bait fish. A robust alewife population would also help the Maine groundfish and whale watching industries, for whom alewives are a key source of food.  For these reasons, as well as the health of the St Croix ecosystem as a whole, CLF remains committed to restoring alewives to their native habitat in the St. Croix.  Stay tuned for next steps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clf.org/blog/ocean-conservation/deja-vu-all-over-again-on-the-st-croix-river/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This Week on TalkingFish.org &#8211; June 16-22</title>
		<link>http://www.clf.org/blog/ocean-conservation/this-week-on-talkingfish-org-june-16-22/</link>
		<comments>http://www.clf.org/blog/ocean-conservation/this-week-on-talkingfish-org-june-16-22/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2012 18:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Madi Gamble</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ocean Conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alewives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fish Talk in the News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fisheries management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[herring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEFMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St. Croix River]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TalkingFish.org]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clf.org/?p=10163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This Week on TalkingFish.org: Peter Baker writes about the need for stricter regulations on New England's industrial Atlantic herring fishery, and our weekly collection of fish stories in the news.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>June 20 &#8211; <a href="http://www.talkingfish.org/opinion/conservationists-fishermen-agree-to-agree" target="_blank">Conservationists and fishermen agree to agree</a> &#8211; By Peter Baker. (Peter Baker directs the Northeast Fisheries Program for the Pew Environment Group.) News stories in New England about fishing often pit conservationists and fishermen against each other over how many fish should be caught, or play up every instance in which a private citizen bemoans government intervention. But today there is a much more compelling story, on which fishermen and conservationists agree.</p>
<p>June 22 &#8211; <a href="http://www.talkingfish.org/in-the-news/fish-talk-in-the-news-friday-june-22" target="_blank">Fish Talk in the News &#8211; Friday, June 22</a> &#8211; This week&#8217;s stories include: new regulations for the industrial Atlantic herring fleet to protect river herring and shad, Native American tribal support for the opening of the St. Croix River to alewives, a bill to fight illegal fishing, a study to map the seafloor of Long Island Sound, an objective look at New England fisheries and fishing communities, and an article about how London is working to achieve their commitment to serve only sustainable seafood at the 2012 Olympic Games.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clf.org/blog/ocean-conservation/this-week-on-talkingfish-org-june-16-22/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>