Mind the Gap: MBTA To Hike Fares, Leave Passengers Behind

Emily Long

Photo Credit: zeldablue/flickr

The MBTA is broke – and, for that matter, broken. According to the MBTA, it is facing a $161 million dollar budget gap. So bad is the MBTA’s financial situation that, last year, it resorted to using hairnets to protect subway motors.

Last week, the MBTA demonstrated its commitment to addressing a chronic lack of funding for public transportation by proposing two scenarios that are as narrow as they are unfair. In its attempt to close its funding gap, the MBTA has painted a bleak future for transportation users – especially bus riders. The public is justifiably upset by this news. Not only is the agency proposing to increase fares, but cut service all around.

One scenario, dubbed Scenario 2, proposes a fare increase of 35% (compared to 43% in Scenario 1) and is accompanied by drastic service cuts to all modes of transportation. (Scenario 1 also involves service cuts, though less drastic.) All ferry routes will be eliminated. Commuter rail service after 10 pm and weekend service will be eliminated. The E line (on the Green line) and Mattapan Trolley will both cease to run on the weekends. The most severe cuts, however, affect bus services.

Richard Davey, Secretary of MassDOT, explains that they “are looking at some underutilized service. [They] have some suburban bus carriers that are not well utilized.” In reality, however, Scenario 2 completely eliminates 101 bus routes. Not just during off-peak hours. These bus routes will cease to exist!

I’m not sure “some” is the best word to describe 101 bus routes, listed and illustrated on the map here from a CTPS Report produced for the MBTA. The routes depicted in red will no longer be served if Scenario 2 is passed. The blue routes, which are sparse in comparison, will be maintained. The bus routes to be eliminated are urban and suburban.

I am shocked to see how many bus routes are proposed to be cut and how pervasive the cuts are.

To be fair, the MBTA’s situation is difficult. As CLF and Transportation for Massachusetts said in a statement last week, “any fare increase should be part of a comprehensive financial plan that addresses not only the MBTA’s operating deficit for at least the next several years, but also provides the funds needed to address the T’s maintenance and capital needs without further driving up debt service costs.” Last year, CLF convened a group of national and local transportation finance experts and they came up with a menu of solutions, the Governor and the Legislature could pick from. We need a plan that solves the whole problem, not one that makes it impossible for people to get to work, school, or the doctor.

Under the current proposals, millions of riders will be forced to drive to work or drive to the nearest transit stop. Others who depend on the bus may be less fortunate. Scenario 2 is predicted to impact 38.1 million riders. Will you be one of them?

Focus Areas

People & Communities

Places

Massachusetts

8 Responses to “Mind the Gap: MBTA To Hike Fares, Leave Passengers Behind”

  1. We should feel lucky comparing to other cities in which people are paying much higher for the same service. It also must be fair to our future users and all tax payers in MA no matter who take T or not, a good core service of T should be maintained. If money could come from other resource other than fare increase and operation saving, please do not hesitate to share. Every one would appreciate it.

  2. We should feel lucky comparing to other cities in which people are paying much higher for the same service. It also must be fair to our future users and all tax payers in MA no matter who take T or not, a good core service of T should be maintained. If money could come from other resource other than fare increase and operation saving, please do not hesitate to share. Every one would appreciate it.

  3. We should feel lucky comparing to other cities in which people are paying much higher for the same service. It also must be fair to our future users and all tax payers in MA no matter who take T or not, a good core service of T should be maintained. If money could come from other resource other than fare increase and operation saving, please do not hesitate to share. Every one would appreciate it.

  4. We should feel lucky comparing to other cities in which people are paying much higher for the same service. It also must be fair to our future users and all tax payers in MA no matter who take T or not, a good core service of T should be maintained. If money could come from other resource other than fare increase and operation saving, please do not hesitate to share. Every one would appreciate it.

  5. Emily Long

    Thanks for your comment, Wayne. I’m glad you understand the importance of a good public transit system. This message needs to heard loud and clear: whether you take the T or not, you benefit from a good transit system. More people choosing to use public transit to get to work means fewer people driving and less traffic congestion. Fewer people driving also means fewer pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions thus better air quality for all. If everyone benefits from the T then we need to share the burden among everyone, not just among transit users. Fare increase and service cuts are but band-aid fixes. T4MA is asking the legislature and administration to identify revenue sources to reduce the T’s deficits and develop adequate funding for years to come so we do not have this conversation again next year. The Dukakis Center and CLF released a report last year that identifies a list of these potential revenue sources.

    Unfortunately, transit service in the Boston area is not comparable to those in other cities. New York City, Philadelphia, and Chicago have train service throughout the night (at least some) and D.C. trains stop at 3am on the weekends. Even San Francisco has a form of a “Night Owl” bus service that Boston cut in 2005. Boston’s last train leaves at 12:45am. So yes, residents in Boston do pay less for transit but considering what they get for it, it should cost less.

  6. Emily Long

    Thanks for your comment, Wayne. I’m glad you understand the importance of a good public transit system. This message needs to heard loud and clear: whether you take the T or not, you benefit from a good transit system. More people choosing to use public transit to get to work means fewer people driving and less traffic congestion. Fewer people driving also means fewer pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions thus better air quality for all. If everyone benefits from the T then we need to share the burden among everyone, not just among transit users. Fare increase and service cuts are but band-aid fixes. T4MA is asking the legislature and administration to identify revenue sources to reduce the T’s deficits and develop adequate funding for years to come so we do not have this conversation again next year. The Dukakis Center and CLF released a report last year that identifies a list of these potential revenue sources.

    Unfortunately, transit service in the Boston area is not comparable to those in other cities. New York City, Philadelphia, and Chicago have train service throughout the night (at least some) and D.C. trains stop at 3am on the weekends. Even San Francisco has a form of a “Night Owl” bus service that Boston cut in 2005. Boston’s last train leaves at 12:45am. So yes, residents in Boston do pay less for transit but considering what they get for it, it should cost less.

  7. Emily Long

    Thanks for your comment, Wayne. I’m glad you understand the importance of a good public transit system. This message needs to heard loud and clear: whether you take the T or not, you benefit from a good transit system. More people choosing to use public transit to get to work means fewer people driving and less traffic congestion. Fewer people driving also means fewer pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions thus better air quality for all. If everyone benefits from the T then we need to share the burden among everyone, not just among transit users. Fare increase and service cuts are but band-aid fixes. T4MA is asking the legislature and administration to identify revenue sources to reduce the T’s deficits and develop adequate funding for years to come so we do not have this conversation again next year. The Dukakis Center and CLF released a report last year that identifies a list of these potential revenue sources.

    Unfortunately, transit service in the Boston area is not comparable to those in other cities. New York City, Philadelphia, and Chicago have train service throughout the night (at least some) and D.C. trains stop at 3am on the weekends. Even San Francisco has a form of a “Night Owl” bus service that Boston cut in 2005. Boston’s last train leaves at 12:45am. So yes, residents in Boston do pay less for transit but considering what they get for it, it should cost less.

  8. Emily Long

    Thanks for your comment, Wayne. I’m glad you understand the importance of a good public transit system. This message needs to heard loud and clear: whether you take the T or not, you benefit from a good transit system. More people choosing to use public transit to get to work means fewer people driving and less traffic congestion. Fewer people driving also means fewer pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions thus better air quality for all. If everyone benefits from the T then we need to share the burden among everyone, not just among transit users. Fare increase and service cuts are but band-aid fixes. T4MA is asking the legislature and administration to identify revenue sources to reduce the T’s deficits and develop adequate funding for years to come so we do not have this conversation again next year. The Dukakis Center and CLF released a report last year that identifies a list of these potential revenue sources.

    Unfortunately, transit service in the Boston area is not comparable to those in other cities. New York City, Philadelphia, and Chicago have train service throughout the night (at least some) and D.C. trains stop at 3am on the weekends. Even San Francisco has a form of a “Night Owl” bus service that Boston cut in 2005. Boston’s last train leaves at 12:45am. So yes, residents in Boston do pay less for transit but considering what they get for it, it should cost less.

Leave a Reply

About the CLF Blog

The views and opinions expressed on this blog do not necessarily represent the opinions or positions of Conservation Law Foundation, our boards, or our supporters.